Flag waving

Do we really need a new flag to wave

Travelling abroad I have always found it amusing how different countries are so keen to wave their respective flags. While I don't actively disrespect the New Zealand ensign, I can't be bothered getting into a fight about my flag is bigger than yours.
Honestly being proud of ones flag seems to be more a case for people of nations that have little else to be proud of, or where they do have pride it is fallacious.
For example Americans waving the Stars and Stripes will often quote how they have one lots of wars.
Is winning wars, killing many native Americans, fighting among yourselves and being the only country to use the Hydrogen bomb to kill civilians, honestly something to be proud of. If it is I don't want to be proud of my country or the flag.

So having said that for our Prime Minister I believe our new flag should represent our future status as a territory of the TPPA. We just replace the Union Jack with the Stars and Stripes.

NSA Q and A

Lets make sense of what has happened in the last 6 years in NZ and why.

Q1. Why has there been a slow ultra-fast broadband roll out around NZ?

Q2. Why was National so fixed on building the $402 million Sky City convention centre?

Q3. Why did Obama give John Key the big photo opportunity with a golf game?

SpearGun

A. The answer to these 3 questions is 

Q4. Why is Speargun so important to the National Party.?

A.    It is not important to National it is only important to John Key and his puppet masters

Q5. What is the purpose of speargun?

A.   Speargun is essential for us to remain compliant with the TPPA, obviously if they can't monitor us they can't manage us.

Q6. From the last answer who are 'they'?

A. Large US corporations, Financial Organisations and US  Lobby groups.

Q7. Why is NZ being targetted for implementing speargun and the TPPA

A.   As a conspiracy theorist I can only speculate that there is a massive bonus for who signs first, thus NZ is in a race to sign. Note the bonus isn't for NZ, but the person who signs it.

Disclaimer: I am a screaming left wing conspiracy theorist.

Please Share

Key's release.

How NZ's Prime Minister was duped

John Key has learnt from the American's example and is taking a preemptive strike against Kim Dotcom's "Moment Of Truth" event, Yes, Key is under pressure, for if his National Party lose this election their chances of signing the lucrative TPP agreement will be scuttled. (lucrative for the first signer that is)

The Prime Minister has taken the bait in believing that the master stroke  of the "Moment of Truth" was to be revealing that the GCSB had developed a business case for prevention of cyber attacks through meta data gathering. The Prime Minister's defense was that he had decided not to go ahead with this plan, and claiming that whistle blower Edward Snowden only has part of the records.

The reality is that there have been more whistle blowers than just Snowden and while the evidence has been difficult to collate, a lot more damaging evidence exists. Pultzer prize winner Glen Greenwald has not come to NZ for no good reason.  Just because the GCSB did not purchase and install this equipment, this in no way refutes that it was purchased and installed under John Key's watch.

While it may be illegal for NZ to spy on citizens without a warrant, it is not illegal for us to ask a third party government organisation such as ASIO to do it for the NZ Government. Once the third party has the information it can share it with another third party in turn and then return the information to the GCSB. Thus not even NZ's own chief communications spy agency knows where the information has truly come from.

This is very similar to how Waihopai is used for spying on satellite and copper communications in New Zealand.

The real question now is, How much do NZ'ers care that they have been spied on and lied to.

John Key's TPPAotearoa Flag for nz

Secret of the Act National Deal

Even for an Act leader Dr Jamie Whyte has been behaving  strange.

He's been introducing policies to the public such as.

• Allowing shop keepers to have firearms behind the counter
• Removing the RMA resource management act
• Extending trial periods of employment to being indefinite.

Meanwhile, Epsom electoral candidate David Seymour has been keeping his head down and door knocking in the electorate.
So what have the National and Act Parties agreed on?
National has obviously signaled to Act that they won't fight for the Epson Electorate seat, whilst expecting Act's unwavering support of a National led government.
But is there more?
Has National asked Act to move even further to the right so National itself can be even more right wing?
If so it would explain the weird policies Dr Whyte has been publicizing.
And the benefit of this to National is that it gets closer to covering 50% of the political spectrum.

The Weird Policy Couple

ISIS beheads only two journalists?

Helping ISIS to be a master of media manipulation are a large number of journalists covering their exploits. So why have only two of the many  been executed.

Surprisingly when the whole ISIS thing started making headlines earlier this year, I had forgotten that I had predicted it over 10 years ago. Sure, I hadn't predicted the name or the nature of ISIS, or even the location, but I had predicted that the geopolitical nature of Iraq and its neighbors would lead to organizations such as ISIS being born.

This certainly wasn't a hard prediction to make as it was based on logic. That logic being that when the USA and friends finally withdrew from Iraq, that the country would be a mess, and so other organizations would emerge and try to take power.

So I'm sure other organizations with more resources made similar predictions.

The USA left Iraq with a form of democracy set up. Unfortunately democratic notions and control take many years to develop. So telling the Iraqi people “you are free of Saddam Hussein now, and you can enjoy voting periodically”, doesn't solve all their problems.

Anyhow, lets look at who ISIS’s neighboring enemies are in the region with concerns.

• Iraq, as mentioned;
• Syria, embroiled in a revolution;
• Iran, trying to build nukes;
• Turkey, hoping to join EU one day;
• Jordan, potentially the first real victim of ISIS (‘This will be discussed in a future blog);
• Lebanon, nobody knows who the government at the time of writing.

The two names I have left out are Israel and Saudi Arabia.

• Israel is probably happy about ISIS for diverting the world’s attention away from Gaza, etc. And ISIS will need to grow substantially to test Israel's defenses.
• Saudi Arabia, is the country most related to the ISIS movement through its links with the Wahhabi movement.  While Saudi Arabia denounces ISIS publicly most of the finance and recruits have been supplied to ISIS have come via Saudi Arabia. (‘another future blog’)
  

Obviously the two journalists have been executed for a reason. And I suggest they were chosen because they have discovered information that ISIS did not want them to let the outside world know about.

Thus I will next suggest that when ISIS next decides to execute a journalist it will be of no use to try negotiating for the journalist’s freedom.

What the journalists have discovered is unlikely to be simple tactics or atrocities as ISIS has no problem displaying this via the surviving journalists following their actions. So it must be something more insidious such as the identity’s of their military advisers.

And this leads to the big questions of. Who are the military advisers and who is supplying them?

POTUS plays golf with Whale Oil's friend

I found dirty politics by Nicky Hagar to be the most sad book I have read on my Kindle. The thoughts and behaviors of Whale Oil and his cohorts showed that there are truly evil persons in our midst.
And worst of all, they have strong connections to those in high places, such as the Justice Minister and the Prime Minister.
Now the really interesting thing I found in DirtyPolitics was the cellular nature of the organization. Most groups did not realize who was also involved. This is similar to how modern terrorist networks are structured.



So is the National Party a terrorist network? I doubt it.
The National Party is probably just a cell in a greater terrorist network, and quite likely the same terrorist network that tries to control the Tea Party in the USA.
Anyhow, the nature of such terrorist organizations makes them truly difficult to map. You can find the links, but without seriously interrogating those with connections it is impossible to view the full extent of the network. But I am highly dubious to believe that it is either NZ originated or controlled.
I don't wish to explain in details how the cells in such a network fully operate. But I'll describe some features.

• They are self funding, eg They get their cash from local operations such as poppy production or Nick Naylor.
• They are unaware that their master is a member of a cell as well, thus they believe they are close to the real action, but in fact they may be several layers down.
• Often the Master has some form of control, such as revealing information on the cell member, but they use the carrot and stick approach in daily operations.
• One of the cell's tasks is to recruit a cell below them

The biggest disadvantage of this form of network is that there is always the potential for the cell to turn rogue. The best case of this was Osama Bin Laden, who ended up being attributed with the 911 disaster after he was relieved of his CIA obligations.
Is this a conspiracy theory?  Yes it is, but this theory could not be entertained if it weren't for the facts uncovered by a hacker, and the written about by Nicky Hager.


Oh, By the way,


Welcome to my first Blog.
Colin Davies